Forum Replies Created

Viewing 54 replies - 1 through 54 (of 54 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: January 16, 2016 – The Rock #426

    Sweet. Looks and reads like a great day. Any pictures of the carnage? And what’s the tower toppling story?

    in reply to: April 6, 2016 – Molto VeLoce Circuit #1040

    Wow, 5 races and 5 podiums for Frank, including a trio of 2nds. Well done! :good:

    in reply to: May 4, 2016 – Molto VeLoce Circuit #1147

    Love the lighting on the NASCAR photos. Nothing like a sun set race!

    in reply to: May 11, 2016 – The River #1159

    Great debut for a new track. Thanks Jim. And great job to Jim and Art for the layout. Made for some fun racing. And who’d-a thunk the closest racing of the night would come in the fastest class! :wacko:

    in reply to: May 18, 2016 – Spa Lyons #1193

    4 for fun! :yes:

    Great night, thx to our soft footed host. :good:

    And thanks to Tony for the use of his controller. It made me a smoother and quicker driver. :yahoo:

    You may not get it back! 😉

    in reply to: July 6, 2016 – The Ring #1329

    Thanks Art, another fun night of racing! Sorry my Jag was so loud and slow. But at least she is pretty. Hmm, reminds me of …..

    And I look forward to seeing that ATV run!

    in reply to: July 23, 2016 – The Rock #1354

    Looks like another great event. Sorry I couldn’t compete with you all.

    in reply to: July 23, 2016 – The Rock #1357

    It was so close KK and I tied for 1st in the first of our three heats in one class! The software listed us as both 1st with identical times/extensions! And because we were racing together for the next two heats (we divided the field into groups of three) that heat set up barn burners for the next two – you NEVER get that when you race everyone straight through… that was the argument why the group should always race in groups of three… Wow it was fun! :good: :good: :good: :good: :good:

    That’s great sometimes, but it’s also fun to race with everyone. After all, that’s what the blue flag is for!  :yahoo:

    in reply to: CAN-AM Thunder (The History) #1378

    Art, thanks for arranging and hosting, fun night. But what happened to your podium results?  :scratch:

    in reply to: December 7, 2016 – Molto VeLoce #1758

    Another fun night of racing upstairs while below the sounds of erotic exotic teased our ears and eyes. Always great to race their and see what’s in the showroom and tucked away in the garage!

    in reply to: Ringwood XV #1437
    in reply to: September 7, 2016 – Molto VeLoce Circuit #1508

    Very unpredictable night. Mustangs 1-2-3 in Trans-Am? That’s rare. A box stock Mr. Slotcar McLaren 3rd in LMP/GT. And cars with lights, both initially prepared by me, 1-2 in Group C? That’s a highlight for me!

    in reply to: Rolexing at The Rock! #2035

    Great day. Thanks KK, and all that braved the lake effect snow and Johnny Law!

    And we orginally thought this would be a combined event. As such here are the overall results!

    …………SC – CLM -GC-Rolex = Laps
    1-Kevin   63 – 69 –  71 – 101    = 304
    2-Jim M  61 – 63 –  69 – 98     = 291
    3-Simon  59 – 65 – 70  – 96    = 290  (44.650 second 4-heat differential)
    4-John     54 – 69 – 71   – 96   = 290  (63.663 second 4-heat differential)
    5-Devan   59 – 67 – 70  – 90    = 286 (56.641 second 4-heat differential)
    6-Frank   59  – 65 – 70  – 92    =286 (65.307 second 4-heat differential)
    7-Tony     54  – 63 – 70  – 97    =284
    8-Mike A 57  – 64 – 70  – 90    =281
    9-Mike V 59  – 65 – 66  – 87     =277
    10-Dave   58  – 64 – 60  – 89     =271

    in reply to: R32 XL @ Molto VeLoce – September 19, 2020 #16386

    Lots of fun, thanks for hosting! And love Thelma and Louis! (But I think I’ll have to amputate their legs to get them into the T-Bird!)

    in reply to: R32 XL @ Molto VeLoce – September 19, 2020 #16395

    Drat, I think I left me Porsche insert on the track. Guess I’ll have to come to the next event to get it back! 2nd Saturday is October 10th, but that’s also Thanksgiving weekend … (which is fine by me)

    in reply to: R32 XXXIX @ Molto VeLoce – July 4, 2020 #15217

    Gents, with 6 racers perhaps we might consider to be more socially distant by not using one of the middle lanes? Would leave more separation among racers and allow for a 3rd marshal…..

    in reply to: R32 XXXIX @ Molto VeLoce – July 4, 2020 #15189

    Art, are we allowed to run a different car in each lane if we want?

    in reply to: R32 XXXIX @ Molto VeLoce – July 4, 2020 #15226

    Great getting back on track. Had a blast. Thanks Art!

    in reply to: R32 XXXIX @ Molto VeLoce – July 4, 2020 #15174

    When I don’t feel well in the morning it’s not the Covid Cough, more like the Molson Malaise!

    in reply to: R32 XXXIX @ Molto VeLoce – July 4, 2020 #15269

    My pleasure …. after all that’s what is best about the hobby … having everyone being able to participate and enjoy!

    in reply to: Building Bass-Seca #19925

    Some video of running a pair of cars I got from Art. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THNnadq_6I0

    in reply to: Building Bass-Seca #19926
    in reply to: R32 XLVIII #25999

    Didn’t know Caitlyn Jenner was going to be in attendance….

    Thank you Porsche911 for hosting a great event. The stars finally aligned to give me a chance to see your excellent track. Beautifully scenerized as well; the cars on the hills off track were as interesting as the ones on. But I still want the phone number of that girl in the hot tub!

    Felix

    in reply to: R32 XLVIII #25998

    Didn’t realize Caitlyn Jenner was going to be there!

    Thank you Porsche911 for hosting a great event. The stars finally aligned to give me a chance to see your excellent track. Beautifully scenerized as well; the cars on the hills off track were as interesting as the ones on. But I still want the phone number of that girl in the hot tub!

    Felix

    Thank you Porsche911 for hosting a great event. The stars finally aligned to give me a chance to see your excellent track. Beautifully scenerized as well; the cars on the hills off track were as interesting as the ones on. But I still want the phone number of that girl in the hot tub!

    Felix

    in reply to: Riverhampton Photo Collage July 14 2022 #30054

    Is replacing the guides a mandatory rule, or are stock guides okay?

    in reply to: Riverhampton Photo Collage July 14 2022 #29842

    Luv the Mini’s … are they all house cars, or a mixture of house and guests cars.

    in reply to: New track in the east #28849

    Looking good Ken. Love the layout and love the wheeled base it’s built on. Looks very sturdy. Wonder if Art can re-do my base? Nice pit area too. Are you planning to run it in one direction only? If so, right to left by the pits? As for a name …. I’ll try to follow up with something later.

    in reply to: New track in the east #30594

    Nice …. Look forward to running on it Ken!

    in reply to: New track in the east #30177

    Ken, glad to hear you’re back at home and on the road to recovery. Look forward to progress reports on the track, and your health. The track looks great.

    in reply to: Making Nova Ridge (Part I) #30412

    It’s a Monster! The Nürburgring of slot car tracks …. look forward to racing on it.

    Would this be the list used to find eligible cars?
    https://www.racingsportscars.com/photo/Targa_Florio-1970-05-03.html

    And is this an open motor race?

    in reply to: R32 LIX #30574

    Thanks Art, fun to come out and race on this new, spectacular, track, and see you all. I’ll take another Saturday off soon.

    in reply to: Christmas at Spa! #30722

    If that’s doors open at 10:30 pm with overnight racing beginning at 11:30 pm I am in!

    Sadly though I don’t think it is, so I will, regretfully, not be able to make it.

    in reply to: Making Cupcake Raceway #34903

    Love the photo montage … the track is, of course, awesome to run on … both ways. Great, great, job!

    in reply to: Group25 Slot Car Show March 5, 2023 #30822

    Sent my request for a table!

    in reply to: Willys Gasser Style Coupe #30803

    Sweet … make another with a raised body and F1 slicks at the back! (But be careful in corners!)

    in reply to: 1936 Auto Union Type C – #4 Bernd Rosemeyer #21027

    Very pretty!

    in reply to: Canada’s Oldest & Largest Slot Car Show! #19724

    A little too far for me …. and too bad we can’t go across the border as there’s a show in Cleveland the following weekend

    in reply to: And now for something completely different F1 Racing Sim #14487

    Nice … and what a great way to self isolate by racing in the 24 days of Le Mans!:yahoo:

    in reply to: 63 Thunderbird #14378

    That is is the base colour of the model. Robin’s egg blue is an apt description. Picture below, copied from the movie Paperback Hero – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ig2EL6WBEs&t=4s)  is hoped for final look. Gearing right now is 12/35 in a 19mm with a BWA motor. The car is not legal for Sportscars as it is too wide and is running a sidewinder configuration with a motor pod. But our group also runs a fendered 14,000 rpm motor class so it can run there.

    in reply to: 63 Thunderbird #14427

    Thanks for the link and photo above. But way beyond my skills to create.

    in reply to: 63 Thunderbird #14390

    Nice … but a little too low for my liking. It looks like it’s ready for LA Blvd cruisin! I know it will handle a lot better, but I prefer to see cars with more realistic ride heights.

    I do want to know though how you made the chassis. Do you have details/photos on that?

    in reply to: Ferrari 1512 #14380

    Sweet!

    in reply to: 63 Thunderbird #14379

    Robins Nest Blue is apt, but that’s the colour of the model out of the box. Gearing on the BWA motor is 12/34 19 mm. Not that it would be competitive, but the car is illegal for Scratch racing as the Sportscar class doesn’t allow cars this wide, with a sidewinder configuration or with a motor pod. But we run a 14,000 open class so I can run it in that if I choose. Here’s a picture, taken from the movie Paperback Hero, of the hoped for final version.

    in reply to: 63 Thunderbird #14368

    in reply to: 63 Thunderbird #14367

    in reply to: 63 Thunderbird #14339

    Exterior

    in reply to: 63 Thunderbird #14337

    We decided to use the existing plastic chassis by Joe messaged a slot.it sidewinder motor pod into the rear and adding a guide holding brace up front. The motor hides under the rear seat cover nicely. Paint work is pending but it will be red with a Sheriff badge on the door like in the movie.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: 63 Thunderbird #14323

    I bought that kit a year ago and Joe Guts is converting it for me to, although it’s a different year, look like the “Sheriff” Thunderbird used in a movie my dad produced, “Paperback Hero”.

    in reply to: 360 degree POV Camera vehicle #2093
    in reply to: 360 degree POV Camera vehicle #2087

    The camera platform is a FlySlot truck with a modified Scaley Range Rover mounted on top. Camera above that. Looks like a real Hollywood type vehicle. Real life cameraman and fellow slotter Adam Gladstone is one of the mad minds behind this.

     

    Some may not know, but our beloved officer Bob has injured his shoulder and is on meds. :wacko:

    So here’s the translation!  :yes:

     

    “I have been looking at some scratch build cars in F1 classes and see the detail  in the front and rear suspension systems.

    A Arms, springs or shocks, and the rear rods or rocker arms.

    I think they really give a good looking finish to the cars and was wondering if there are any tutorials around on how to do these things .

    All in the name of scale accuracy and good looking detail.”

     

    Hope you feel better soon Bob!  :yahoo:

    Hmm, and I have some Strombecker’s, I think, for sale! (I’ll be posting eventually) 

    in reply to: Sideways Grp 5 pods #888
    I’d be surprised if it makes much of a difference. The design of the new pods was done to secure the motor more. Since most of us glue that in anyway, the performance should be similar. If we didn’t do any “tuning” then there might be an advantage, but I think testing will prove negligible benefits to the new pods.
Viewing 54 replies - 1 through 54 (of 54 total)